Houston Minority Shareholder Oppression Attorney
Texas Shareholder Dispute Lawyers
Closely held corporations have ownership structures that often leave minority shareholders in vulnerable positions. Minority Shareholder oppression occurs when majority shareholders leverage their power to take action that unfairly prejudices the minority.
When a typical shareholder scenario plays out, a minority shareholder at odds with management can become trapped without any ability to protect their interests or withdraw their investment due to an inability to sell closely held stock. In some cases, if the minority shareholder is also an employee, they can be terminated with stock they can’t sell. This form of minority shareholder oppression is commonly referred to as a “squeeze out” or “freeze out.”
Examples of Squeeze-outs and Freeze-outs May Include:
- Terminating key business relationships
- Ignoring key contracts minority shareholders control
- Refusing access to corporate records
- Refusing to pay dividends or bonuses
- Threatening to reduce the value of the company
- Reducing the value of the stock on paper
- Theft of trade secrets
- Awarding excessive bonuses to themselves or other business partners
How Our Texas Business Lawyers Can Help:
As recognized industry leaders in business law with over 100 years of combined experience, our attorneys at Hendershot Cowart P.C. provide the comprehensive counsel shareholders need to protect their interests. Given the difficult nature of these cases, particularly in light of a landmark Texas Supreme Court decision that overturned minority shareholder oppression as a common law cause of action (or the right to sue for damages or enforcement), minority shareholders require creative solutions and experienced representation capable of producing the positive outcomes they need.
Remedy Options - Claims to Consider After Ritchie V. Rupe
In the absence of a common law cause of action for minority shareholder oppression brought about by Ritchie v. Rupe, many felt a significant blow had been dealt to the rights of minority shareholders. However, minority shareholders may still have options and adequate remedies to hold majority shareholders accountable for oppressive conduct.
For example, the same conduct that can contribute to oppression claims may also provide the basis for other causes of action - including:
- An accounting
- Breach of fiduciary duty
- Breach of contract
- Fraud and fraudulent transfers
- Unjust enrichment
- Quantum merit
- Theft of trade secrets
- Violation of shareholder agreements, operating agreements or bylaws
Even if you or your business is not experiencing minority shareholder oppression, our Houston business law firm can advise you on rights and protections in shareholder agreements and other governing documents that can help mitigate future potential areas of conflict.
Shareholder Agreement Benefits
Because things don’t always go as planned, establishing a shareholders’ agreement is vital to protecting oneself in the event that relationships change and disputes arise. However, not all shareholders create the type of prenuptial agreements that can protect them when things go wrong, especially when small privately held companies are forged through relationships between friends or family reluctant to believe either party would ever engage in oppressive conduct.
Without such agreements, minority shareholders find themselves exposed to minority shareholder oppression, limited to few options for extracting themselves from a business relationship without financial loss. By working with an attorney early in the process and crafting a reasonable shareholder agreement, minority shareholders can protect their interests and benefit from options should the need arise.
At Hendershot Cowart P.C., our business practice spans decades and includes experience with legal issues from business formation through litigating complex shareholder disputes. We understand recent changes to minority shareholder oppression law in Texas and can prepare the strongest possible case to protect your business interests.
Shareholder Dilution and Preemptive Rights
Shareholder oppression can take many forms, and for some minority shareholders that includes dilution of their ownership interest and voting power. If a 10% shareholder owns 100 shares of 1,000 issued shares, for example, the issuance of 1,000 new shares would render them a 5% owner.
To protect against dilution and safeguard ownership interest, dividend rights, and voting power, shareholders may opt for preemptive rights – a type of right of first refusal to purchase additional shares in any future issued stock.
While preemptive rights allow shareholders to purchase additional shares in any new interest to maintain their ownership percentage, they’re not the norm in Texas. Under Texas law:
- Corporations formed after 9/1/2003 do not have preemptive rights, unless they’re explicitly granted in the Certificate of Formation.
- Corporations formed prior to 9/1/2003 have preemptive rights, unless the Certificate provides otherwise.
Given the opt-out / opt-in nature of preemptive rights, they’re relatively rare in Texas. However, they can be negotiable for shareholders looking to protect themselves, often in circumstances where they’re used as incentive for early or majority investors who take on great risk when funding a new venture, or struggling business.
Even when shareholders have preemptive rights, they may not always be of benefit if a shareholder lacks financial means to purchase them, or if corporations or majority shareholders issue stock under one of the exceptions outlined in Texas Business Organizations Code sections 21.203-21.208. Majority owners intent on diluting shares can still effectively do so.
Because preemptive rights are not a fail-safe solution to preventing dilution, and because Texas’ Ritchie v. Rupe ruling eliminated the shareholder oppression cause of action in Texas, shareholders whose rights are violated in squeeze-outs that utilize dilution will need to explore their options for legal remedy. Although every case is different, this may include:
- Ultra vires actions, if new shares were issued in violation of preemptive rights or other restriction outlined in the Certificate of Formation, such as the number of shares issued exceeding authorized shares, or shares being issued for no consideration.
- Breach of fiduciary duty, if a large number of shares were issues for substantially inadequate consideration.
- Derivative shareholder lawsuits brought on behalf of the corporation over breach of fiduciary duty and / or loss of value of a corporation’s shares, or direct shareholder actions.
- Individual shareholder claims over breach of trust / informal fiduciary duty, or conversion
- Breach of contract / violation of shareholder agreement
If you are a shareholder and would like to learn more about preventing shareholder dilution or taking legal action, Hendershot Cowart P.C. is available to discuss your rights and options. Our award-winning legal team offers proactive counsel for contract review and negotiation, start-ups and corporate governance, and dispute resolution via mediation, arbitration or litigation.
Call (713) 909-7323 or contact us online to schedule a consultation.
“They've always come through for me.”- Joseph D.
“Your law firm has impressed me to no end, and should anyone I know ever need legal representation, I will be sure to refer them to ...”- Dr. R
“We sincerely appreciate your dedication and drive in straightening out the most difficult situation in our life.”- Raga and DC Gunnia